Computer Security
[EN] securityvulns.ru
no-pyccku



Related information

  Еще одна уязвимость в сертификатах Netscape

  new vulnerability in Netscape effectively disables SSL server auth

From:CERT <cert_(at)_cert.gov>
Date:27.05.2000
Subject:Advisory CA-2000-08

CERT Advisory CA-2000-08 Inconsistent Warning Messages in Netscape
Navigator

  Original release date: May 26, 2000
  Last Revised: --
  Source: CERT/CC
  
  A complete revision history is at the end of this file.
  
Systems Affected

    * Systems running Netscape Navigator, up to and including Navigator
      4.73, without the Personal Security Manager installed
      
Overview

  A flaw exists in Netscape Navigator that could allow an attacker to
  masquerade as a legitimate web site if the attacker can compromise the
  validity of certain DNS information. This is different from the
  problem reported in CERT Advisory CA-2000-05, but it has a similar
  impact. This vulnerability was recently discovered by Kevin Fu of of
  the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and, independently, by Jon
  Guyer.
  
  If a user visits a web site in which the certificate name does not
  match the site name and proceeds with the connection despite the
  warning produced by Netscape, then subsequent connections to any sites
  that have the same certificate will not result in a warning message.
  
  It should be noted that neither this vulnerability, nor the one
  described in CERT Advisory CA-2000-05 represent a weakness or
  vulnerability in SSL. Rather, these problems are a result of the
  fundamentally insecure nature of the DNS system, combined with an
  over-reliance on web browsers to do "sanity checking." In both cases,
  it is (and has been) within the power of the user to validate
  connections by examining certificates and verifying the certificates
  against their expectations.
  
  Netscape and other browsers take steps to warn users when the DNS
  information appears to be suspicious; the browser may not be able to
  do all the checks necessary to ensure that the user is connecting to
  the correct location. Therefore, as a general practice, the CERT/CC
  recommends validating certificates before any sensitive transactions.
  
I. Description

  Digital certificates are small documents used to authenticate and
  encrypt information transmitted over the Internet. One very common use
  of digital certificates is to secure electronic commerce transactions
  through SSL. The kind of certificates used in e-commerce transactions
  are called X.509 certificates. The X.509 certificates help a web
  browser and the user ensure that any sensitive information transmitted
  over the Internet is readable only by the intended recipient. This
  requires verifying the recipient's identity and encrypting data so
  that only the recipient can decrypt it.
  
  The "padlock" icon used by Netscape, Internet Explorer, and other
  browsers is an indication that an SSL-secured transaction has been
  established to someone. It does not necessarily indicate to whom the
  connection has been established. Netscape and other browsers take
  steps to warn users when DNS-based information conflicts with the
  strongly authenticated information contained in the X.509 certificates
  used in SSL transactions. These warnings are supplemental information
  to help users decide if they're connecting to whom they think they are
  connecting. These steps and warnings are designed to protect against
  attacks on the DNS information.
  
  If you rely solely on the warning dialogs provided by web browsers to
  determine if the connection is with whom you think it is or if you do
  not fully understand the implications of the dialogs, then you may be
  subject to the attacks described in this document and CA-2000-05.
  
  The essence of the problem is this: Within one Netscape session, if a
  user clicks on "continue" in response to a "hostname does not match
  name in certificate" error, then that certificate is incorrectly
  validated for future use in the Netscape session, regardless of the
  hostname or IP address of other servers that use the certificate.
  
  For example, suppose that an attacker constructs a web site named
  example.com, authenticated by a certificate that does not match
  example.com, and convinces a victim to navigate there. Netscape will
  present a warning dialog indicating that the site to which the user
  thinks she's navigating (www.example.com) does not match the
  information presented in the certificate. If the user does not intend
  to provide any sensitive information to www.example.com, she may
  choose to continue with the connection (i.e., she may choose to click
  "OK" in response to the warning dialog), possibly attributing the
  warning dialog to a benevolent misconfiguration on the part of
  example.com or failing to understand the implications of the warning
  dialog.
  
  Then, within the same session, no warning dialogs will be presented
  under the following circumstances:
    * the attacker co-opts the DNS system in some fashion to cause the
      DNS name of a legitimate site to resolve to the IP address of a
      system under the control of the attacker
    * the system under the control of the attacker is authenticated
      using the same certificate as www.example.com, which the user
      previously accepted in the warning dialog mentioned above
    * the victim attempts to connect to the legitimate site (but instead
      gets directed to the site under the control of the attacker by
      virtue of the attack on DNS)
      
  This allows the attacker to bypass the ordinary "sanity checking" done
  by Netscape, and the result is that the user may provide sensitive
  information to the attacker.
  
II. Impact

  Attackers can trick users into disclosing information (such as credit
  card numbers, personal data, or other sensitive information) intended
  for a legitimate web site - if the user has previously accepted a
  certificate in which the name recorded in the certificate does not
  match the DNS name of the web site to which the user is connecting.
  
III. Solution

Check Certificates

  The CERT/CC recommends that prior to providing any sensitive
  information over SSL, you check the name recorded in the certificate
  to be sure that it matches the name of the site to which you think you
  are connecting. For example, in Netscape, click on the "padlock" icon
  to engage the "Security Info" dialog box. Then click on the "View
  Certificate" button. A dialog box will appear, listing the certificate
  authority that signed the certificate and the server for which it was
  issued. If you do not trust the certificate authority or if the name
  of the server does not match the site to which you think you're
  connecting, be suspicious.
  
Validate Certificates Independently

  Web browsers come configured to trust a variety of certificate
  authorities. If you delete the certificates of all the certificate
  authorities in your browser, then whenever you encounter a new SSL
  certificate, you will be prompted to validate the certificate
  yourself. You can do this by validating the fingerprint on the
  certificate through an alternate means, such as the telephone. That
  is, the same dialog box mentioned above also lists a fingerprint for
  the certificate. If you wish to validate the certificate yourself,
  call the organization for which the certificate was issued and ask
  them to confirm the fingerprint on the certificate.
  
  Deleting the certificates of the certificate authorities in your
  browser will cause the browser to prompt you for validation whenever
  you encounter a new site certificate. This may be inconvenient and
  cumbersome, but it provides you with greater control over which
  certificates you accept.
  
  It is also important to note that this sort of verification is only
  effective if you have an independent means through which to validate
  the certificate. This sort of validation is called out-of-band
  validation. For example, calling a phone number provided on the same
  web page as the certificate does not provide any additional security.
  
  The CERT/CC encourages all organizations engaging in electronic
  commerce to train help desk or customer support personnel to answer
  questions about certificate fingerprints.
  
Reject certificates that don't match the host name

  As a specific defense against this vulnerability, we recommend not
  accepting certificates that don't match the host name. The most likely
  cause of a non-matching certificate is a configuration error on the
  part of the web server administrator. However, a user is unable to
  distinguish between a benign misconfiguration and a malicious attack.
  Even if the user does not intend to provide any sensitive information
  to a site with a non-matching certificate, answering "OK" to this
  dialog may permit an attacker to successfully carry out the exploit.
  
Stay up-to-date with patches, workarounds, and certificate management
products

  Apply a patch from your vendor. Appendix A contains vendor
  information.
  
Appendix A Vendor Information

iPlanet

  [...] the potential exploit in question can be completely prevented if
  the user does not click "continue" as stated above. Because of this
  safety measure, we do not feel an emergency release is necessary.
  However, we are planning on fixing this in a future release of
  Communicator, scheduled for release later this year.
  
  Additionally, this flaw was fixed in PSM approximately 6 months before
  [the initial report of the vulnerability].
    _________________________________________________________________
  
  The CERT Coordination Center thanks Kevin Fu of MIT and Jon Guyer for
  initially discovering and reporting this vulnerability, and their help
  in constructing this advisory.
    _________________________________________________________________
  
  Shawn Hernan was the primary author of this document.
  ______________________________________________________________________
  
  This document is available from:
  http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2000-08.html
  ______________________________________________________________________
  
CERT/CC Contact Information

  Email: cert@cert.org
         Phone: +1 412-268-7090 (24-hour hotline)
         Fax: +1 412-268-6989
         Postal address:
         CERT Coordination Center
         Software Engineering Institute
         Carnegie Mellon University
         Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
         U.S.A.
         
  CERT personnel answer the hotline 08:00-20:00 EST(GMT-5) / EDT(GMT-4)
  Monday through Friday; they are on call for emergencies during other
  hours, on U.S. holidays, and on weekends.
  
Using encryption

  We strongly urge you to encrypt sensitive information sent by email.
  Our public PGP key is available from
  
  http://www.cert.org/CERT_PGP.key
      
  If you prefer to use DES, please call the CERT hotline for more
  information.
  
Getting security information

  CERT publications and other security information are available from
  our web site
  
  http://www.cert.org/
      
  To be added to our mailing list for advisories and bulletins, send
  email to cert-advisory-request@cert.org and include SUBSCRIBE
  your-email-address in the subject of your message.
  
  * "CERT" and "CERT Coordination Center" are registered in the U.S.
  Patent and Trademark Office.
  ______________________________________________________________________
  
  NO WARRANTY
  Any material furnished by Carnegie Mellon University and the Software
  Engineering Institute is furnished on an "as is" basis. Carnegie
  Mellon University makes no warranties of any kind, either expressed or
  implied as to any matter including, but not limited to, warranty of
  fitness for a particular purpose or merchantability, exclusivity or
  results obtained from use of the material. Carnegie Mellon University
  does not make any warranty of any kind with respect to freedom from
  patent, trademark, or copyright infringement.
    _________________________________________________________________
  
  Conditions for use, disclaimers, and sponsorship information
  
  Copyright 2000 Carnegie Mellon University.
  
  Revision History
May 26, 2000: initial release

About | Terms of use | Privacy Policy
© SecurityVulns, 3APA3A, Vladimir Dubrovin
Nizhny Novgorod

 
 



Rating@Mail.ru